SRO Video: Guys Doing Guy Things
April 7 - May 14, 2009
SRO Video: Guys Doing Guy Things
Oregon Artists: Mike Bray, Dan Gilsdorf, Mack McFarland and Stephen Slappe.
more info at
http://www.marylhurst.edu/theartgym/2009srovideo.php
SRO Video features work that goes beyond single channel video - it is video that combines projected images, installation and sculpture. You explore on your feet, rather than view from a seat. Stephen Slappe is creating a four-channel, four-wall projection of travelers on a remote road in rural Oregon. Mack McFarland is interested in ideas of utopia and dystopia and has been conducting and recording interviews in supermarket parking lots and street corners around the state. Dan Gilsdorf's works include a tiny video camera and model train, and burning trees as seen on stacked televisions. Mike Bray's installations use a combination of video and sculpture to conflate real and cinematic space.
Interview with Dan GilsdorfThis is an all male show
How was that experience? Like how do you deal with sharing the spot light
and do you think working with female artists would be different and if yes in which way? First of all, I should state that the curator, Terri Hopkins, did not have an all male show in mind when she started out. She intended to put together a group of works that related to the Sesquicentennial Film Festival and, as it turned out, all the works she chose were by men. The exhibition was not collaborative and all the installations were in progress before they were selected for the show. None of our work would have been any different had there been any other exhibitors (female or otherwise). As for the spotlight, Terri has put together a strong and cohesive show and I am very proud to be included.
If you had to introduce your artistic practice to a greater public how would you describe it? Generally I see myself as a sculptor, that is; one who makes objects. I am interested in the relations between mass, space, time, and content, so I try to create works that relate to all of these realms.
Video has become the darling of the art world the last few years. Is it financially a sustainable medium and what does the future hold for it? I’d say that video is pretty solidly within the canon of the fine arts at this point. In western culture video images are inundating the visual landscape at every level, and video technology, like all technology, is getting cheaper and cheaper. All things considered, I feel pretty comfortable stating that it is now cheaper to be a video artist than it is to be a painter. At the same time, considering the environmental impact of the technology and industrial infrastructure that video requires this may change.
Has our reality become more artificial and will lead this to an evolution of the Human experience or to it's demise?Reality by definition is not artificial. However, in the western world the human experience has come to be dominated by mediated information. Information comes to us by means of communications technology that acts as a filter. For the purpose of dissemination, content is translated into a medium and translated back into human experience at the receiving end. This is not a new phenomenon. The written word--indeed language itself--is a communications technology, just the same as a video streaming over a high-speed wireless internet connection. As such, there are sacrifices to its use; i.e., the breach of meaning between a thought and a word. But, as any reader of fiction knows, these language technologies also allow the communication of profound subtleties. An example is metaphor, a device that cannot exist without language. In this case it is the technology of language that allows for a more profound expression of meaning.
Since now the technologies of communication (digital technology in specific) are also generative, maybe the human experience is becoming LESS artificial. The message at the receiving end has NOT been translated; it is EXACTLY like the original in every way or, more accurately, it is a de facto original!
Using technology seems a logical way of presenting a subject. What attracted you to it and do you see it necessary to convey your message?
For me it is about the image. I am a sculptor, but my work tends to incorporate images, and video is one way of doing so. Image technologies relay information, but they also contain their own content that they add to a work.
Do you expect the audience to play a participatory role?I really consider viewing artwork as a participatory act in general. I don’t believe an artwork can be complete solely within its own corpus. Art finds its true completion in relation to the subjectivity that is the consciousness of a viewer, by engaging a viewer’s memories, emotions, intellect, etc. Therefore, in any work of art, be it a painting, film, or piece of music, the viewers’ charge is to consider, and thereby realize the artwork.
What is your goal or and message?In this show, my goal was to use video images to evoke mass within space and time along with a certain sense of place. My hope was that viewers might experience these images in a visceral way, similar to the way one experiences mass and time out in the world. My thinking on this is related to my conception of the sublime. If the sublime can be defined as a situation in which one experiences both the perceptible and the incomprehensible simultaneously, I was trying to create a situation where the perception of an image would be analogous to real experience in three dimensions.
Also, of course, the content of the images I used relates to a kind of visual regionalism, a reference to a particular landscape and culture.
The films deal and play here in OR. What makes this region so original to live in and for an artist?I am not a native and the reasons I came here had nothing to do with my being an artist so it’s hard for me to say. But, I can say that it is a great place to be an artist and a great place to live. Many of the regional or cultural themes that my work has always dealt with apply here, so it seems like a good fit.
Are you aspirations to be a film makers or conceptual artists which label would you feel most comfortable? See above.
Would you do another collaboration and what is next for you?This show was not a collaborative endeavor. However, I’m very happy to be among these artists. They are very skilled and I consider them my friends.
Anything else you want to share?No, gracias.
Interview with Mike BrayThis is an all male show. How was that experience? Like how do you deal
with sharing the spot light and do you think working with female artists would be different and if yes in which way?I enjoy working with other artist, male or female, and am always
fascinated to see how the work interacts. A group show acts as more of an
ensemble cast of work where different elements of your work can arise
because of the interaction between pieces. You get to know your work in a
new way so it is really challenging and eye opening.
If you had to introduce your artistic practice to a greater public how
would you describe it?My work investigates our relationship with cinema. I move between single
channel video, video installation, photo, and objects, but the common
thread is an exploration of the cinematic as a spectacle. I grew up as
kind of a film buff and started making work to find out what made
cinematic moments such a big part of me.
Video has become the darling of the art world the last few years. Is it
financially a sustainable medium and what does the future hold for it?As long as there are questions that video can ask that painting, drawing,
or another medium can’t, it is an important medium and has room for
critical inquiry. As a medium, video installation has been commercially
viable since the 60s and I believe it will continue to do so. I am not
sure that I think financial sustainability is an appropriate way to give
it value as a discipline though. Screens are omnipresent and it would be
disheartening to think that we would stop asking questions because of
commerce.
Has our reality become more artificial and will lead this to an evolution
of the Human experience or to it's demise?I’m not sure if I would categorize it as an evolution or demise, but I do
see it as move towards an artificial. I believe that screen culture, or
media experience through cinema, television, or the Internet is in some
sense reprogramming us. It is why I think it is important to explore how
they operate and create desire in the viewer.
Using technology seems a logical way of presenting a subject. What
attracted you to it and do you see it necessary to convey your message?My subject attracted me to the use of technology. I’m interested in films
and memories and where the lines start to blur. In order to explore the
blurring it is a necessary evil that I use screens, the moving image,
sound, and so on.
Do you expect the audience to play a participatory role?Not necessarily participatory, but I hope that my work is challenging and
raises questions.
What is your goal or and message?To create critical viewers
The films deal and play here in OR. What makes this region so original to
live in and for an artist?My work is not Oregon specific, but I think the Northwest is a great place
to make work. The proximity of San Francisco, Portland, Seattle, and
Vancouver means that you are bound to find an audience for your work.
Are you aspirations to be a filmmakers or conceptual artists which label
would you feel most comfortable?Conceptual artist.
Would you do another collaboration and what is next for you?I didn’t feel that this show was necessarily a collaboration but I would
be interested in doing one in the future.